Cuban mahogany, once prized for density and exceptional chatoyance, dwindled early, pushing makers toward Honduran sources with slightly different working characteristics. In the twentieth century, African khaya often stood in commercially, echoing color yet differing anatomically. Auction catalogs may blur these distinctions, so your own endgrain notes matter. Look for wormholes, oxidation tone, and historical context of the form. Share desk interiors and drawer runners; secondary woods and construction details frequently confirm what glamorous surfaces merely suggest about origin and age.
True Brazilian rosewood carries a sweet, unmistakable scent and dramatic ink-on-chocolate veining, but legal protections and scarcity complicate modern encounters. Indian rosewood shares familial traits with subtler figure. Many lookalikes—pau ferro, stained walnuts—confuse the eye. Pore size, oily feel, weight, and UV reaction help. We will explore compliant, ethical collecting and restoration practices. Post ambiguous cases with scent notes and endgrain images; community experience often resolves questions that photographs alone leave maddeningly open to interpretation and speculation.
Teak’s silica content, warm straw-to-honey color, and oily feel made it a darling of mid-century modern studios, especially in Denmark. Oil finishes flatter its depth, while sharp tools are required to manage abrasion. Look for minimalist joinery, floating panels, and smart grain orientation that resists movement. Many pieces combine teak with beech or oak internally. Share close-ups of arm profiles, drawer sides, and finish sheen. Together we can separate period originals from later homages and celebrate careful maintenance that preserves quiet luster.
Pigmented stains and toners can mimic walnut’s depth on cheaper woods, or push oak toward mahogany warmth. Grain fillers tint pores convincingly. Instead of guessing, verify with endgrain and discreet solvent tests. Evaluate consistency inside cases, under feet, and behind moldings where color often tells truth. Post paired photos—exterior glamor and interior reality—to help others learn the signals. Your careful comparisons train new eyes, and together we reduce unnecessary stripping that erases irreplaceable historical surface information forever.
Re-veneering often leaves repeating figure mismatches, suspiciously perfect seams, or edges sanded thin at wear points. Modern cores change weight, sound on tap, and screw-holding behavior. Cross-check hinge screws, back panels, and drawer bottoms for coherence. Original glue ghosts, tool shadows, and oxidation lines inside cases rarely lie. Share difficult examples where craft was excellent; we will dissect them kindly, learning patterns and building confidence. This respectful skepticism safeguards value, history, and the dignity of past and present craftsmanship alike.
Use a diffuse main light and a raking side light to reveal figure and ray fleck, then shoot square to the surface and again at a shallow angle to capture chatoyance. Include a ruler or coin for scale and a neutral gray card for color. Avoid heavy filters that distort hue. Share before-and-after cleaning photos to document real change. These consistent habits make remote collaboration possible and help you revisit complex cases with clarity months or years later.
Pair receipts, family stories, and dealer notes with species observations, veneer patterns, finish behavior, and tool marks. Photograph inscriptions inside drawers, paper labels, or pencil assembly numbers; note whether secondary woods align with region and period. Keep diagrams of bookmatching and crossbanding directions. When insights shift, annotate dates and reasons. Post a template you use; others can adapt and improve it. This practice builds credibility, supports valuations, and preserves memory that would otherwise be lost between generations.
Bring your mysteries, partial attributions, and close-ups to the comments. Ask specific, testable questions, tag the details you have, and propose next steps. Subscribe for deep dives, case-study breakdowns, and office hours where we analyze reader submissions together. Celebrate corrections generously; humility accelerates learning. Suggest species or periods for upcoming challenges. This evolving dialogue turns solitary inspection into a lively apprenticeship, where many careful eyes and respectful debate make better identifications than any one expert working alone.
All Rights Reserved.